Tailings Dams

Challenging structures that need to be monitored carefully.

Tailings storage facilities are some of the most challenging structures to operate in the mining industry. These structures fail far more regularly than normal water-storage dams (Azam and Li, 2010). Many of these structures are susceptible to liquefaction and piping failure. Therefore, they need to be monitored carefully.

Currently, most geophysical techniques used to monitor these structures only provide point measurements (piezometers, flow meters and CPTu). As a result, these techniques can easily miss the early signs of failure, where the zone of degradation could be small and localised.

In some cases, radars and/or high-resolution cameras are used to monitor small deformations on the dam walls. Unfortunately, these methods measure surface perturbations and are incapable of detecting internal changes within the walls.

Of further concern with current monitoring technology is the poor performance during heavy rainfall. Small deformations on the dam wall become very difficult to detect due to the fluid on the surface of the wall. Similarly, seepage flow rates are difficult to interpret during heavy rainfall due to rain flowing down the embankment, contaminating the measurements. These limitations are unfortunate, as heavy rain has been known to be a significant contributing factor to tailings dam wall failure (Azam and Li, 2010).

In 2018, ambient seismic noise interferometry is being used to monitor the time-dependent behaviours of environments such as volcanoes, landslides, underground mines, geothermal reservoirs and active faults zones. Additionally, recent laboratory experiments have shown that this method is able to detect internal erosion (piping failure) in earthen embankments (Planès et al., 2016). This method essentially uses ambient seismic vibrations to create virtual seismic sources (Curtis et al., 2006).

Pioneering work by IMS has revealed that this method can be used to monitor with remarkable accuracy the stability of tailings dams over time (Olivier et. al., 2017). The study showed that subtle changes in seismic velocity can reveal internal erosion and increased seepage during a period of heavy rainfall, even when other geophysical instruments could not.  

IMS has demonstrated that ambient noise tomography can also be used to image the internal structure of tailings dam walls. The high-resolution images can be used to determine the depth of the phreatic surface and to illuminate seepage pathways and internal erosion (Olivier et. al. 2018).

References
Azam, S. and Li, Q., 2010. Tailings dam failures: A review of the last one hundred years: Geotechnical News, 28, 50–54.

Planès, T., Mooney, M., Rittgers, J., Parekh, M., Behm, M and Snieder, R., 2016. Time-lapse monitoring of internal erosion in earthen dams and levees using ambient seismic noise: Geotechnique, 66, no. 4, 301–312, 14.P.268.

Curtis, A., Gerstoft, P., Sato, H., Snieder, R. and Wapenaar, K., 2006. Seismic interferometry – turning noise into signal: The Leading Edge, 25 (9).

Olivier, G., Brenguier, F., De Wit, T. and Lynch, R., 2017. Monitoring the stability of tailings dam walls with ambient seismic noise, The Leading Edge, 36 (4).

Olivier, G., De Wit, T., Brenguier, F., Bezuidenhout, L. and Kunjwa, T., 2018. Ambient noise Love wave tomography at a gold mine tailings storage facility, Geotechnique Letters.